Deal or No Deal
Season: 5 Episode: 166 [ change ]
Missed this episode? Watch the last 10 mins here.
Ruth's Game with Box Number 16.
In the first round Ruth chose:
Chloe with box number 17 had £10
John with box number 20 had 1p
Tony with box number 19 had £500
The remaining boxes are: 10p, 50p, £1, £5, £50, £100, £250, £1,000, £3,000, £5,000, £10,000, £15,000, £35,000, £50,000, £75,000, £100,000, £250,000.
| Offers | Boxes Meter | We Recommend | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fair | Banker's | ||
| £12,723 | £8,500 |   | No Deal |
The Banker called with an offer of: £8,500 which was rejected.
In the second round Ruth chose:
Roopa with box number 10 had £50,000
The remaining boxes are: 10p, 50p, £5, £50, £100, £250, £1,000, £5,000, £10,000, £15,000, £35,000, £75,000, £100,000, £250,000.
| Offers | Boxes Meter | We Recommend | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fair | Banker's | ||
| £13,691 | £9,500 | | No Deal |
The Banker called with an offer of: £9,500 which was rejected.
In the third round Ruth chose:
Andrew with box number 3 had £15,000
The remaining boxes are: 10p, 50p, £5, £50, £100, £250, £1,000, £5,000, £10,000, £75,000, £100,000.
| Offers | Boxes Meter | We Recommend | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fair | Banker's | ||
| £5,674 | £1,000 | | No Deal |
The Banker called with an offer of: £1,000 which was rejected.
In the fourth round Ruth chose:
The remaining boxes are: 10p, £5, £50, £250, £1,000, £5,000, £75,000, £100,000.
| Offers | Boxes Meter | We Recommend | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fair | Banker's | ||
| £8,052 | £9,500 | | No Deal |
The Banker called with an offer of: £9,500 which was rejected.
In the fifth round Ruth chose:
The remaining boxes are: £5, £50, £250, £75,000, £100,000.
| Offers | Boxes Meter | We Recommend | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fair | Banker's | ||
| £15,139 | £185,000 | | No Deal |
The Banker called with an offer of: £185,000 which was accepted.
Dealt at £185,000
Now Ruth is trying to find 0 boxes which contain . If Ruth finds in the next round, Ruth has made a great deal.
In the sixth round Ruth chose:
Stacie with box number 2 had £75,000
The remaining boxes are: £50, £250.
| Offers | Boxes Meter | We Recommend | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fair | Banker's | ||
| £131 | £99 | | Deal |
The Banker called with an offer of: £99
Ruth had £250 in box number 16 which means Ruth beat the Banker by £184,750.
The remaining box belonged to Caine with box number 7 which had £50.
Summary:
Dealt at: £185,000
Amount in their Box: £250
Highest Offer: £185,000
Lowest Offer: £99
Synopsis:
A tearful start for Ruth, but she is soon in her stride, but then a dramatic crash hits her in the 3rd round and her offer tumbles. She recovers well though and is soon back on track and getting better offers again. A tough decision at the end of the 5th round sees some more intervention from the Banker!
Watch the last 10 minutes of this episode!
Press Play to Begin
Comments:
Please Note: Only messages about this game are allowed here.
LOL, £185,000?! Someone must've pressed the "0" key too many times. £18,500 was the only good offer in the game, the others were just beyond a joke. I mean in the opening round she took out 4 blues and £20,000 and she only gets offered £8,500 yet yesterday's player took out £35,000 and 2 other Reds and he was offered £11,000. What?! Anyway, this was still a good game overall and I'm pleased Ruth took £18,500. It was just too risky to go on and that was probably the quickest game destroying round I've ever seen. £75,000 & £100,000 taken out in less than 5 seconds! Well done Ruth, enjoy the cash and the house! :D
xxxxx.bb.sky.comYes could the owner of the site please correct this error thank you. Well at least this time Ruth dealt at the right time unlike yesterdays, but most of the offers were a joke like you said. I mean come on 4 blues and £20,000 should at least produce an offer in the 5 figures and then she takes out £50,000 with 2 blues and he still can't make it to £10,000. I would offer £13,000, £17,500, £7,000, £15,000 and £26,000. Why does he offer more in Gaz's game and yesterday, but not for Ruth? On a positive side though at least there were no gimmicks but there would have been if one of the 2 big reds had stayed to the end with a blue.
xxxxx.bagu.cable.ntl.comI have to say I really like these quick fire rounds, Gaz did nearly the perfect round with quick fire, and Alex last year did do the perfect round 1p, 10p and 50p and Ruth had the round that she needed twice, and could have so easily happened the other way, Offers at start were poor but they improved, and there hasn't been a banker's gamble for a very long time, since Justin's game( and it was quite fair)
xx.27.151.149I missed this game and just scrolled to the end to see what she won and thought "Damn, I must've missed a good game if £185,000 was offered" lol.
xxxxx.perr.cable.virginmedia.com(response 2 perrys comment) the offer was actually £18,500 lol the people that run the site made a mistake when they were updating lol
xx.149.63.168a £185k offer would b impossible if the banker never offered more than the average - which for the dream finish is £175k... anyway i agree, that £18.5k offer was the only decent one. if i was to guess a reason as to why those first 2 offers were particularly stingy, it's because ruth didn't make the same impression on the banker that the likes of gaz and steve did
xx.134.194.146last night for the first time ever, I had a dream about a man on deal or no deal (no one in particular) but I had a dream that they were playing the game and they were left with £15,000 and £250,000 at the end of the game and they turned down £100,000 and won the jackpot.
xxxxx.lei3.cable.ntl.comU never know 05brewhi maybe ur dream will become reality 1 day, hopefully it will happen soon
xx.149.63.168As long as it's won the same way as Laura's and not Alice's
xxxxx.range86-176.btcentralplus.comfor gods sake £185,000?? that is beyond a spelling error because it says it at the bottom as well and it says ''she beat the banker by £184,750'' that is not a spelling error because it has been typed 3 times. I'm guessing from that that this is an automatic system.
xxxxx.leed.cable.ntl.com